securetheserights.net

Home ______About______Blog______Links and Files______Events______Q&A______Forum______News______Shop

Are Treaties the Law? Understanding the “Supremacy Clause”


Many people post the latest news about treaties that our elected servants want to pass, treaties about globalist control of our health care, or initiatives to ban private gun ownership worldwide (does not apply to criminals, of course!). They are terrified, and invite us to be, also, that such treaties will destroy our rights. After all, they have been told, it says right in the Constitution that treaties are the supreme law of the land, right alongside the Constitution itself.

These totalitarian proposals are disgusting for sure, and scary, but not as scary as many people think. Of course if we have people in our own government who decide to enforce UN totalitarian garbage, we will have to deal with it, either by active resistance, or, much better, by due process of law against all those who try to do so. More about that later.

But the main reason why many people get so alarmed by this is, because they misunderstand that above-mentioned “supremacy clause” in our Constitution (it is Clause 2 of Article VI) Here it is, in full:


This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

This appears to say that treaties are of equal stature to the Constitution itself, HOWEVER that is not really what it says. It says that treaties made “under the authority of the US” are law-of-the-land. So if a treaty mandates something OUTSIDE the authority we granted to our government in the Constitution, such as requiring a vax, or prohibiting guns, then it has ZERO lawful authority. Our government cannot authorize or require anything that we do not explicitly give it the power to do. If any official tries to enforce such a thing, or even votes for it, he may be guilty of an actual crime, such as deprivation of Constitutional rights under color of law ((US Code Title 18 Section 242), or conspiracy to do so.…

“But..”, you may say, “But these people in government do not CARE what the Constitution, or any law, says, that gets in their way!”

This brings us right back to the fundamental principle of Tactical Civics, that is, we-the-people ordained and established our government to secure our rights. That is its simple job-description. Since that job-description is LAW, violating it is CRIME.

ALTHOUGH we have all grown up being mistaught that law-enforcement is a function that belongs exclusively to government, (the boys in blue, the alphabet agencies..), that is NOT what our Constitution says. In our system of law set forth in that document, we explicitly reserve to ourselves fundamental law-enforcement authority: As Grand Juries, we investigate and bring charges; as petit juries we determine the validity and applicability of the law as well as declare guilt or innocence; as Militia we physically execute the law, as well as suppressing insurrections (large-scale or organized law-breaking), and repelling invasions.

So in the face of any actual or proposed treaty that violates our God-given rights, we are not powerless. If we have done the homework of educating our community and building recognized local militia (see the blog article titled, “Why Ordinances?”), we can bring the full actual FORCE of the law to bear against anyone who participates in or supports the violation. We call for a Grand Jury to determine who in our jurisdiction has participated in the conspiracy to violate our rights and exactly what codes or statutes they may have violated. If we find probable cause, we indict them. By the same dogged and unsleeping process of oversight, supported as needed by the armed power of militia, we ensure that the full due process of law is applied to the criminals, without interruption or interference.

I do not think that many officials will actually have to go to jail, before unConstitutional treaties will reliably get hooted off the floor of our Congress, if indeed they get there at all.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *